The
history of Christianity concerns the
Christian religion, its followers and the Church with its various denominations, from the 1st century to the present.
Christianity emerged in the
Levant (now Palestine and Israel) in the mid-1st century AD. Christianity spread initially from Jerusalem throughout the Near East, into places such as Syria, Assyria, Mesopotamia, Phoenicia, Asia Minor, Jordan and Egypt. In the 4th century it was successively adopted as the state religion by Armenia in 301, Georgia in 319, the Aksumite Empire in 325, and the Roman Empire in 380. After the Council of Ephesus in 431 the Nestorian Schism created the Church of the East. The Council of Chalcedon in 451 further divided Christianity into Oriental Orthodoxy and Chalcedonian Christianity. Chalcedonian Christianity divided into the Roman Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church in the Great Schism of 1054. The Protestant Reformation created new Christian communities that separated from the Roman Catholic Church and have evolved into many different denominations.
Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Christianity spread to all of Europe in the
Middle Ages. Christianity expanded throughout the world during Europe's Age of Exploration from the Renaissance onwards, becoming the world's largest religion. Today there are 2 billion Christians, one third of humanity.
Early Christianity (c.33–325)
During its early history, Christianity grew from a
1st-century Jewish following to a religion that existed across the entire Greco-Roman world and beyond.
Early Christianity may be divided into 2 distinct phases: the apostolic period, when the first apostles were alive and led the Church, and the post-apostolic period, when an early episcopal structure developed, and persecution was periodically intense. The Roman persecution of Christians ended in AD 313 when Constantine the Great decreed tolerance for the religion. He then called the First Council of Nicaea in AD 325, beginning of the period of the First seven Ecumenical Councils.
Apostolic Church
Main article:
Apostolic Age
The Apostolic Church was the community led by the
apostles, and to some degree, Jesus' relatives.[7] In his "Great Commission", the resurrected Jesus commanded that his teachings be spread to all the world. While the historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles is disputed by critics, the Acts of the Apostles is the major primary source of information for this period. Acts gives a history of the Church from this commission in 1:3–11 to the spread of the religion among the gentiles[8] and the eastern Mediterranean by Paul and others.
The first Christians were essentially all ethnically
Jewish or Jewish Proselytes. In other words, Jesus preached to the Jewish people and called from them his first disciples, see for example Matthew 10. However, the Great Commission
is specifically directed at "all nations," and an early difficulty
arose concerning the matter of Gentile (non-Jewish) converts as to
whether they had to "become Jewish" (usually referring to circumcision and adherence to dietary law), as part of becoming Christian. Circumcision in particular was considered repulsive by Greeks and Hellenists[9] while circumcision advocates were labelled Judaisers, see Jewish background to the circumcision controversy for details. The actions of Peter, at the conversion of Cornelius the Centurion,[8] seemed to indicate that circumcision and food laws did not apply to gentiles, and this was agreed to at the apostolic Council of Jerusalem. Related issues are still debated today.
The doctrines of the apostles brought the Early Church into conflict
with some Jewish religious authorities. This eventually led to their
expulsion from the
synagogues, according to one theory of the Council of Jamnia. Acts records the martyrdom of the Christian leaders, Stephen and James of Zebedee. Thus, Christianity acquired an identity distinct from Rabbinic Judaism, but this distinction was not recognised all at once by the Roman Empire, see Split of early Christianity and Judaism for details. The name "Christian" (Greek Χριστιανός) was first applied to the disciples in Antioch, as recorded in Acts 11:26.[10]
Some contend that the term "Christian" was first coined as a derogatory
term, meaning "little Christs", and was meant as a mockery, a term of
derision for those that followed the teachings of Jesus.[citation needed]
Early Christian beliefs and creeds
The sources for the beliefs of the apostolic community include the Gospels and
New Testament epistles. The very earliest accounts of belief are contained in these texts, such as early creeds and hymns, as well as accounts of the Passion, the empty tomb, and Resurrection appearances; some of these are dated to the 30s or 40s CE, originating within the Jerusalem Church.[12]
Post-Apostolic Church
The post-apostolic period concerns the time after the death of the
apostles (roughly 100 AD) until persecutions ended with the legalisation
of Christian worship under Emperors
Constantine the Great and Licinius.
Persecutions
According to the New Testament, Christians were subject to various
persecutions from the beginning. This involved even death for Christians such as Stephen (Acts 7:59) and James, son of Zebedee (12:2). Larger-scale persecutions followed at the hands of the authorities of the Roman Empire, beginning with the year 64, when, as reported by the Roman historian Tacitus, the Emperor Nero blamed them for that year's great Fire of Rome.
According to Church tradition, it was under Nero's persecution that
Peter and Paul were each martyred in Rome. Similarly, several of the New Testament writings mention persecutions and stress endurance through them.
Early Christians suffered
sporadic persecution
as the result of local pagan populations putting pressure on the
imperial authorities to take action against the Christians in their
midst, who were thought to bring misfortune by their refusal to honour
the gods.[13][14] The last and most severe persecution organised by the imperial authorities was the Diocletianic Persecution, 303 - 311.[15]
Reasons for the spread of Christianity
In spite of these at-times intense persecutions, the Christian religion continued its spread throughout the
Mediterranean Basin.[16] There is no agreement on an explanation of how Christianity managed to spread so successfully prior to the Edict of Milan and the establishment of Christianity as the state religion of the Roman Empire. For some Christians, the success was simply the natural consequence of the truth of the religion and the hand of Providence. However, similar explanations can be claimed for the spread of Islam and Buddhism. In The Rise of Christianity, Rodney Stark argues that Christianity triumphed over paganism chiefly because it improved the lives of its adherents in various ways.[17]
Another factor was the way in which Christianity combined its promise of a general
resurrection of the dead with the traditional Greek belief that true immortality
depended on the survival of the body, with Christianity adding
practical explanations of how this was going to actually happen at the end of the world.[18] For Mosheim the rapid progression of Christianity was explained by two factors: translations of the New Testament and the Apologies composed in defence of Christianity.[19]
Edward Gibbon, in his classic The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire,
discusses the topic in considerable detail in his famous Chapter
Fifteen, summarizing the historical causes of the early success of
Christianity as follows: "(1) The inflexible, and, if we may use the
expression, the intolerant zeal of the Christians, derived, it is true,
from the Jewish religion, but purified from the narrow and unsocial
spirit which, instead of inviting, had deterred the Gentiles from
embracing the law of Moses. (2) The doctrine of a future life, improved
by every additional circumstance which could give weight and efficacy to
that important truth. (3) The miraculous powers ascribed to the
primitive church. (4) The pure and austere morals of the Christians. (5)
The union and discipline of the Christian republic, which gradually
formed an independent and increasing state in the heart of the Roman
empire."[20]
Structure and the episcopacy
In the post-Apostolic church, bishops emerged as overseers of urban
Christian populations, and a hierarchy of clergy gradually took on the
form of
episkopos (overseers; and the origin of the term
bishop) and presbyters (elders; and the origin of the term priest), and then deacons
(servants). But this emerged slowly and at different times for
different locations. Clement, a 1st-century bishop of Rome, refers to
the leaders of the Corinthian church in his epistle to Corinthians
as bishops and presbyters interchangeably. The New Testament writers
also use the terms overseer and elders interchangeably and as synonyms.[21]
Post-apostolic bishops of importance include
Polycarp of Smyrna, Clement of Rome, and Irenaeus of Lyons. These men reportedly knew and studied under the apostles personally and are therefore called Apostolic Fathers. Each Christian community also had presbyters,
as was the case with Jewish communities, who were also ordained and
assisted the bishop. As Christianity spread, especially in rural areas,
the presbyters exercised more responsibilities and took distinctive
shape as priests. Lastly, deacons
also performed certain duties, such as tending to the poor and sick. In
the 2nd century, an episcopal structure becomes more visible, and in
that century this structure was supported by teaching on apostolic succession, where a bishop becomes the spiritual successor of the previous bishop in a line tracing back to the apostles themselves.
The diversity of early Christianity can be documented from the New Testament record itself. The
Book of Acts admits conflicts between Hebrews and Hellenists, and Jewish Christians and Gentile Christians, and Aramaic speakers and Greek speakers.
The letters of Paul, Peter, John, and Jude all testify to intra-Church
conflicts over both leadership and theology. In a response to the Gnostic teaching, Irenaeus created the first document describing what is now called apostolic succession.[22]
Early Christian writings
As Christianity spread, it acquired certain members from
well-educated circles of the Hellenistic world; they sometimes became
bishops, but not always. They produced two sorts of works: theological
and "
apologetic",
the latter being works aimed at defending the faith by using reason to
refute arguments against the veracity of Christianity. These authors are
known as the Church Fathers, and study of them is called patristics. Notable early Fathers include Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus of Lyons, Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, and Origen of Alexandria.
Early art
Christian art only emerged relatively late, and the first known Christian images emerge from about 200 AD,
[23]
though there is some literary evidence that small domestic images were
used earlier. The oldest known Christian paintings are from the Roman
Catacombs, dated to about AD 200, and the oldest Christian sculptures are from sarcophagi, dating to the beginning of the 3rd century.[24]
Although many Hellenised Jews seem, as at the
Dura-Europos synagogue, to have had images of religious figures, the traditional Mosaic prohibition of "graven images"
no doubt retained some effect, although never proclaimed by
theologians. This early rejection of images, and the necessity to hide
Christian practise from persecution, leaves us with few archaeological
records regarding early Christianity and its evolution.[24]
Early heresies
The
New Testament itself speaks of the importance of maintaining correct (orthodox) doctrine and refuting heresies, showing the antiquity of the concern.[25] Because of the biblical proscription against false prophets, Christianity has always been occupied with the orthodox interpretation of the faith. Indeed one of the main roles of the bishops in the early Church was to determine and retain important correct beliefs, and refute contrarian opinions, known as heresies.
As there were sometimes differing opinions among the bishops on new
questions, defining orthodoxy would occupy the Church for some time.
The earliest controversies were often
Christological in nature; that is, they were related to Jesus' divinity or humanity. Docetism held that Jesus' humanity was merely an illusion, thus denying the incarnation (Deity becoming human). Arianism held that Jesus, while not merely mortal, was not eternally divine and was, therefore, of lesser status than the Father.[26] Trinitarianism held that the Father, Son, and the Holy Spirit were all strictly one being with three hypostases or persons. Many groups held dualistic beliefs,
maintaining that reality was composed into two radically opposing
parts: matter, seen as evil, and spirit, seen as good. Such views gave
rise to some theology of the "incarnation" that were declared heresies.
Most scholars agree that the Bible teaches that both the material and
the spiritual worlds were created by God and were therefore both good.[27]
The development of doctrine, the position of orthodoxy, and the
relationship between the various opinions is a matter of continuing
academic debate. Since most Christians today subscribe to the doctrines
established by the
Nicene Creed, modern Christian theologians tend to regard the early debates as a unified orthodox position against a minority of heretics. Other scholars, drawing upon distinctions between Jewish Christians, Pauline Christianity, and other groups such as and Marcionites, argue that early Christianity was always fragmented, with contemporaneous competing beliefs.[28]
Biblical canon
The Biblical canon is the set of books Christians regard as divinely
inspired and thus constituting the Christian Bible. Though the Early
Church used the Old Testament according to the canon of the
Septuagint (LXX), the apostles did not otherwise leave a defined set of new scriptures; instead the New Testament developed over time.
The writings attributed to the apostles circulated amongst the earliest Christian communities. The
Pauline epistles
were circulating in collected form by the end of the 1st century AD.
Justin Martyr, in the early 2nd century, mentions the "memoirs of the
apostles", which Christians called "gospels" and which were regarded as
on par with the Old Testament,[29] which was written in narrative form where "in the biblical story God is the protagonist, Satan (or evil people/powers) are the antagonists, and God's people are the agonists".[30][31]
A four gospel canon (the
Tetramorph) was in place by the time of Irenaeus,
c. 160, who refers to it directly.
[32] By the early 3rd century,
Origen of Alexandria
may have been using the same 27 books as in the modern New Testament,
though there were still disputes over the canonicity of Hebrews, James,
II Peter, II and III John, and Revelation[33] Such works that were sometimes "spoken against" were called Antilegomena. In contrast, the major writings and most of what is now the New Testament were Homologoumena, or universally acknowledged for a long time, since the middle of the 2nd century or before.[34] Likewise the Muratorian fragment shows that by 200 there existed a set of Christian writings similar to the current New Testament.[35]
In his Easter letter of 367,
Athanasius, Bishop of Alexandria, gave the earliest preserved list of exactly the books that would become the New Testament canon.[36] The African Synod of Hippo, in 393, approved the New Testament, as it stands today, together with the Septuagint books, a decision that was repeated by Councils of Carthage in 397 and 419.[37] These councils were under the authority of St. Augustine, who regarded the canon as already closed.[38] Likewise, Damasus' commissioning of the Latin Vulgate edition of the Bible, c. 383, was instrumental in the fixation of the canon in the West.[39] In 405, Pope Innocent I sent a list of the sacred books to Exuperius, a Gallic bishop.
When these bishops and councils spoke on the matter, however, they
were not defining something new, but instead "were ratifying what had
already become the mind of the Church."
[40] Thus, by the 4th century, there existed unanimity in the West concerning the New Testament canon,
[41] and by the
5th century
the East, with a few exceptions, had come to accept the Book of
Revelation and thus had come into harmony on the matter of the canon.[42] Nonetheless, a full dogmatic articulation of the canon was not made until the 1546 Council of Trent for Roman Catholicism,[43] the 1563 Thirty-Nine Articles for the Church of England, the 1647 Westminster Confession of Faith for Calvinism, and the 1672 Synod of Jerusalem for Greek Orthodoxy.
Christianity during late antiquity (313–476)
Spread of Christianity to AD 325
Spread of Christianity to AD 600
Establishment of Roman orthodoxy
Galerius, who had previously been one of the leading figures in persecution, in 311 issued an edict which ended the Diocletian persecution of Christianity.[44]
After halting the persecutions of the Christians, Galerius reigned for
another 2 years. He was then succeeded by an emperor with distinctively pro Christian leanings, Constantine the Great.
The Emperor
Constantine I was exposed to Christianity by his mother, Helena.[45] At the Battle of Milvian Bridge
in 312, Constantine commanded his troops to adorn their shields with
the Christian symbol in accordance with a vision that he had had the
night before. After winning the battle, Constantine was able to claim
the emperorship in the West[46] In 313, he issued the Edict of Milan, officially legalizing Christian worship.
How much Christianity Constantine adopted at this point is difficult
to discern. The Roman coins minted up to eight years subsequent to the
battle still bore the images of Roman gods.
[45]
Nonetheless, the accession of Constantine was a turning point for the
Christian Church. After his victory, Constantine supported the Church
financially, built various basilicas, granted privileges (e.g.,
exemption from certain taxes) to clergy, promoted Christians to some
high-ranking offices, and returned property confiscated during the Great
Persecution of Diocletian.
[47]
Between 324 and 330, Constantine built, virtually from scratch, a new imperial capital that came to be named for him:
Constantinople. It had overtly Christian architecture, contained churches within the city walls, and had no pagan temples.[48] In accordance with a prevailing custom, Constantine was baptised on his deathbed.
Constantine also played an active role in the leadership of the
Church. In 316, he acted as a judge in a North African dispute
concerning the
Donatist controversy. More significantly, in 325 he summoned the Council of Nicaea, the first Ecumenical Council. Constantine thus established a precedent for the emperor as responsible to God
for the spiritual health of their subjects, and thus with a duty to
maintain orthodoxy. The emperor was to enforce doctrine, root out
heresy, and uphold ecclesiastical unity.[49]
Constantine's son's successor, known as
Julian the Apostate, was a philosopher who upon becoming emperor renounced Christianity and embraced a Neo-platonic
and mystical form of paganism shocking the Christian establishment. He
began reopening pagan temples and, intent on re-establishing the
prestige of the old pagan beliefs, he modified them to resemble
Christian traditions such as the episcopal structure and public charity
(previously unknown in Roman paganism). Julian's short reign ended when
he died while campaigning in the East.
Later
Church Fathers wrote volumes of theological texts, including Augustine, Gregory Nazianzus, Cyril of Jerusalem, Ambrose of Milan, Jerome, and others. Some of these fathers, such as John Chrysostom and Athanasius, suffered exile, persecution, or martyrdom from Arian Byzantine Emperors. Many of their writings are translated into English in the compilations of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers.
Arianism and the first Ecumenical Councils
A popular doctrine of the 4th century was
Arianism, the denial of the divinity of Christ, as propounded by Arius.
Though this doctrine was condemned as heresy and eventually eliminated
by the Roman Church it remained popular underground for some time. In
the late 4th century Ulfilas, a Roman bishop and an Arian, was appointed as the first bishop to the Goths,
the Germanic peoples in much of Europe at the borders of and within the
Empire. Ulfilas spread Arian Christianity among the Goths firmly
establishing the faith among many of the Germanic tribes, thus helping
to keep them culturally distinct.[50]
During this age, the first Ecumenical Councils were convened. They were mostly concerned with Christological disputes. The
First Council of Nicaea (325) and the First Council of Constantinople (381) resulted in condemning Arian teachings as heresy and producing the Nicene Creed.
Christianity as Roman state religion (380 AD)
On 27 February 380, with the
Edict of Thessalonica put forth under Theodosius I, the Roman Empire officially adopted Trinitarian Christianity as its state religion. Prior to this date, Constantius II (337-361) and Valens (364-378) had personally favored Arian or Semi-Arian forms of Christianity, but Valens' successor Theodosius I supported the Trinitarian doctrine as expounded in the Nicene Creed.
After its establishment, the Church adopted the same organisational
boundaries as the Empire: geographical provinces, called dioceses,
corresponding to imperial governmental territorial division. The
bishops, who were located in major urban centres as per pre-legalisation
tradition, thus oversaw each diocese. The bishop's location was his
"seat", or "see". Among the sees,
five came to hold special eminence: Rome, Constantinople, Jerusalem, Antioch, and Alexandria.
The prestige of most of these sees depended in part on their apostolic
founders, from whom the bishops were therefore the spiritual successors.
Though the bishop of Rome was still held to be the First among equals, Constantinople was second in precedence as the new capital of the empire.
Theodosius I decreed that others not believing in the preserved
"faithful tradition", such as the Trinity, were to be considered to be
practicers of illegal
heresy,[51] and in 385, this resulted in the first case of capital punishment of a heretic, namely Priscillian.[52][53]
Nestorianism and the Sassanid Empire
During the early 5th century the
School of Edessa
had taught a christological perspective stating that Christ's divine
and human nature were distinct persons. A particular consequence of this
perspective was that Mary could not be properly called the mother of
God, but could only be considered the mother of Christ. The most widely
known proponent of this viewpoint was the Patriarch of Constantinople Nestorius. Since referring to Mary as the mother of God had become popular in many parts of the Church this became a divisive issue.
The Roman Emperor
Theodosius II called for the Council of Ephesus
(431), with the intention of settling the issue. The councils
ultimately rejected Nestorius' view. Many churches who followed the
Nestorian viewpoint broke away from the Roman Church, causing a major
schism. The Nestorian churches were persecuted and many followers fled
to the Sassanid Empire where they were accepted.
The
Sassanid (Persian) Empire had many Christian converts early in its history tied closely to the Syriac branch of Christianity. The Empire was officially Zoroastrian
and maintained a strict adherence to this faith in part to distinguish
itself from the religion of the Roman Empire (originally the pagan Roman
religion and then Christianity). Christianity became tolerated in the
Sassanid Empire and as the Roman Empire increasingly exiled heretics during the 4th and 6th centuries, the Sassanid Christian community grew rapidly.[54]
By the end of the 5th century the Persian Church was firmly established
and had become independent of the Roman Church. This church evolved
into what is today known as the Church of the East.
Miaphysitism
In 451 the
Council of Chalcedon
was held to further clarify the christological issues surrounding
Nestorianism. The council ultimately stated that Christ's divine and
human nature were separate but both part of a single entity, a viewpoint
rejected by many churches who called themselves miaphysites. The resulting schism created a communion of churches, including the Armenian, Syrian, and Egyptian churches.[55]
Though efforts were made at reconciliation in the next few centuries
the schism remained permanent resulting in what is today known as Oriental Orthodoxy.
Monasticism
Monasticism
is a form of asceticism whereby one renounces worldly pursuits and goes
off alone as a hermit or joins a tightly organized community. It began
early in the Church as a family of similar traditions, modeled upon
Scriptural examples and ideals, and with roots in certain strands of
Judaism. John the Baptist
is seen as an archetypical monk, and monasticism was also inspired by
the organisation of the Apostolic community as recorded in Acts 2.
Eremetic monks, or
hermits, live in solitude, whereas cenobitics live in communities, generally in a monastery, under a rule (or code of practice) and are governed by an abbot. Originally, all Christian monks were hermits, following the example of Anthony the Great. However, the need for some form of organised spiritual guidance lead Pachomius
in 318 to organise his many followers in what was to become the first
monastery. Soon, similar institutions were established throughout the
Egyptian desert as well as the rest of the eastern half of the Roman
Empire. Women were especially attracted to the movement.[56]
Central figures in the development of monasticism were
Basil the Great in the East and, in the West, Benedict, who created the famous Rule of Saint Benedict, which would become the most common rule throughout the Middle Ages, and starting point for other monastic rules.[57]
Early Middle Ages (476–799)
The transition into the Middle Ages was a gradual and localised
process. Rural areas rose as power centres whilst urban areas declined.
Although a greater number of Christians remained in the
East (Greek areas), important developments were underway in the West (Latin areas) and each took on distinctive shapes.
The
Bishops of Rome,
the Popes, were forced to adapt to drastically changing circumstances.
Maintaining only nominal allegiance to the Emperor, they were forced to
negotiate balances with the "barbarian rulers" of the former Roman
provinces. In the East the Church maintained its structure and character
and evolved more slowly.
Western missionary expansion
The stepwise loss of
Western Roman Empire dominance, replaced with foederati and Germanic kingdoms, coincided with early missionary efforts into areas not controlled by the collapsing empire.[58] Already as early as in the 5th century, missionary activities from Roman Britain into the Celtic areas (current Scotland, Ireland and Wales) produced competing early traditions of Celtic Christianity, that was later reintegrated under the Church in Rome.
Prominent missionaries were Saints
Patrick, Columba and Columbanus. The Anglo-Saxon
tribes that invaded southern Britain some time after the Roman
abandonment, were initially pagan, but converted to Christianity by Augustine of Canterbury on the mission of Pope Gregory the Great. Soon becoming a missionary center, missionaries such as Wilfrid, Willibrord, Lullus and Boniface would begin converting their Saxon relatives in Germania.
The largely Christian Gallo-Roman inhabitants of
Gaul (modern France) were overrun by the Franks in the early 5th century. The native inhabitants were persecuted until the Frankish king Clovis I converted from paganism to Roman Catholicism
in 496. Clovis insisted that his fellow nobles follow suit,
strengthening his newly established kingdom by uniting the faith of the
rulers with that of the ruled.[59]
After the rise of the
Frankish Kingdom and the stabilizing political conditions, the Western part of the Church increased the missionary activities, supported by the Merovingian kingdom as a means to pacify troublesome neighbor peoples. After the foundation of a church in Utrecht by Willibrord, backlashes occurred when the pagan Frisian king Radbod destroyed many Christian centres between 716 and 719. In 717, the English missionary Boniface was sent to aid Willibrord, re-establishing churches in Frisia continuing missions in Germany.[59]
Byzantine iconoclasms
Following a series of heavy military reverses against the
Muslims, the Iconoclasm emerged in the early 8th century. In the 720s the Byzantine Emperor Leo III the Isaurian banned the pictorial representation of Christ, saints, and biblical scenes. In the West, Pope Gregory III held two synods at Rome and condemned Leo's actions. The Byzantine Iconoclast Council at Hieria in 754, ruled that holy portraits were heretical.[60]
The movement destroyed much of the Christian church's early artistic
history. The iconoclastic movement itself was later defined as heretical
in 787 under the
Seventh Ecumenical council, but enjoyed a brief resurgence between 815 and 842.
High Middle Ages (800–1299)
Carolingian Renaissance
The
Carolingian Renaissance was a period of intellectual and cultural revival of literature, arts, and scriptural studies during the late 8th and 9th centuries, mostly during the reigns of Charlemagne and Louis the Pious, Frankish
rulers. To address the problems of illiteracy among clergy and court
scribes, Charlemagne founded schools and attracted the most learned men
from all of Europe to his court.
Monastic Reform
A view of the Abbey of Cluny.
Cluny
From the
6th century onward most of the monasteries in the West were of the Benedictine Order. Owing to the stricter adherence to a reformed Benedictine rule, the abbey of Cluny
became the acknowledged leader of western monasticism from the later
10th century. Cluny created a large, federated order in which the
administrators of subsidiary houses served as deputies of the abbot of
Cluny and answered to him. The Cluniac spirit was a revitalising
influence on the Norman church, at its height from the second half of
the 10th centuries through the early 12th.
Cîteaux
The next wave of monastic reform came with the
Cistercian Movement. The first Cistercian abbey was founded in 1098, at Cîteaux Abbey. The keynote of Cistercian life was a return to a literal observance of the Benedictine rule, rejecting the developments of the Benedictines. The most striking feature in the reform was the return to manual labour, and especially to field-work.
Inspired by
Bernard of Clairvaux,
the primary builder of the Cistercians, they became the main force of
technological diffusion in medieval Europe. By the end of the 12th century the Cistercian houses numbered 500, and at its height in the 15th century
the order claimed to have close to 750 houses. Most of these were built
in wilderness areas, and played a major part in bringing such isolated
parts of Europe into economic cultivation
Mendicant orders
A third level of monastic reform was provided by the establishment of the
Mendicant orders.
Commonly known as friars, mendicants live under a monastic rule with
traditional vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience, but they emphasise
preaching, missionary activity, and education, in a secluded monastery.
Beginning in the 12th century, the Franciscan order was instituted by the followers of Francis of Assisi, and thereafter the Dominican order was begun by St. Dominic.
Investiture Controversy
Henry IV at the gate of Canossa, by August von Heyden.
The
Investiture Controversy, or Lay investiture controversy, was the most significant conflict between secular and religious powers in medieval Europe. It began as a dispute in the 11th century between the Holy Roman Emperor Henry IV, and Pope Gregory VII concerning who would appoint bishops (investiture).
The end of lay investiture threatened to undercut the power of the
Empire and the ambitions of noblemen for the benefit of Church reform.
Bishops collected revenues from estates attached to their bishopric.
Noblemen who held lands (fiefdoms) hereditarily passed those lands on
within their family. However, because bishops had no legitimate
children, when a bishop died it was the king's right to appoint a
successor. So, while a king had little recourse in preventing noblemen
from acquiring powerful domains via inheritance and dynastic marriages, a
king could keep careful control of lands under the domain of his
bishops.
Kings would bestow bishoprics to members of noble families whose
friendship he wished to secure. Furthermore, if a king left a bishopric
vacant, then he collected the estates' revenues until a bishop was
appointed, when in theory he was to repay the earnings. The infrequence
of this repayment was an obvious source of dispute. The Church wanted to
end this lay investiture because of the potential corruption, not only
from vacant sees but also from other practices such as
simony. Thus, the Investiture Contest was part of the Church's attempt to reform the episcopate and provide better pastoral care.
Pope Gregory VII issued the
Dictatus Papae,
which declared that the pope alone could appoint or depose bishops, or
translate them to other sees. Henry IV's rejection of the decree lead to
his excommunication and a ducal revolt. Eventually Henry received
absolution after dramatic public penance barefoot in Alpine snow and
cloaked in a hairshirt (see
Walk to Canossa), though the revolt and conflict of investiture continued.
Likewise, a similar controversy occurred in England between
King Henry I and St. Anselm,
Archbishop of Canterbury, over investiture and ecclesiastical revenues
collected by the king during an episcopal vacancy. The English dispute
was resolved by the Concordat of London, 1107, where the king renounced
his claim to invest bishops but continued to require an oath of fealty
from them upon their election.
This was a partial model for the
Concordat of Worms (Pactum Calixtinum),
which resolved the Imperial investiture controversy with a compromise
that allowed secular authorities some measure of control but granted the
selection of bishops to their cathedral canons.
As a symbol of the compromise, lay authorities invested bishops with
their secular authority symbolised by the lance, and ecclesiastical
authorities invested bishops with their spiritual authority symbolised
by the ring and the staff.
Medieval Inquisition
The
Medieval Inquisition is a series of Inquisitions (Roman Catholic Church bodies charged with suppressing heresy)
from around 1184, including the Episcopal Inquisition (1184–1230s) and
later the Papal Inquisition (1230s). It was in response to movements
within Europe considered apostate or heretical to Western Catholicism, in particular the Cathars and the Waldensians
in southern France and northern Italy. These were the first inquisition
movements of many that would follow. The inquisitions in combination
with the Albigensian Crusade were fairly successful in ending heresy. Historian Thomas F. Madden has written about popular myths regarding the Inquisition.[61]
Conversion of the Scandinavians
Early evangelisation in Scandinavia was begun by
Ansgar, Archbishop of Bremen, "Apostle of the North". Ansgar, a native of Amiens,
was sent with a group of monks to Jutland Denmark in around 820 at the
time of the pro-Christian Jutish king Harald Klak. The mission was only
partially successful, and Ansgar returned two years later to Germany,
after Harald had been driven out of his kingdom.
In 829 Ansgar went to
Birka on Lake Mälaren,
Sweden, with his aide friar Witmar, and a small congregation was formed
in 831 which included the king's own steward Hergeir. Conversion was
slow, however, and most Scandinavian lands were only completely
Christianised at the time of rulers such as Saint Canute IV of Denmark and Olaf I of Norway in the years following AD 1000.
Stavronikita monastery.
Conversion of the Slavs
Though by 800 Western Europe was ruled entirely by Christian kings,
East and Central Europe remained an area of missionary activity. For
example, in the 9th century SS.
Cyril and Methodius had extensive missionary success in the region among the Slavic peoples, translating the Bible and liturgy into Slavonic. The Baptism of Kiev in 988 spread Christianity throughout Kievan Rus', establishing Christianity among the Ukraine, Belarus and Russia.
In the 9th and 10th centuries, Christianity made great inroads into
Eastern Europe, including Bulgaria and Kievan Rus'.
The evangelisation, or Christianisation, of the Slavs was initiated by
one of Byzantium's most learned churchmen — the Patriarch Photius. The
Byzantine emperor Michael III chose Cyril and Methodius in response to a
request from Rastislav, the king of Moravia who wanted missionaries
that could minister to the Moravians in their own language.
The two brothers spoke the local
Slavonic vernacular and translated the Bible
and many of the prayer books. As the translations prepared by them were
copied by speakers of other dialects, the hybrid literary language Old Church Slavonic was created.
Methodius later went on to convert the
Serbs.[citation needed] Some of the disciples returned to Bulgaria where they were welcomed by the Bulgarian Knyaz Boris I
who viewed the Slavonic liturgy as a way to counteract Byzantine
influence in the country. In a short time the disciples of Cyril and
Methodius managed to prepare and instruct the future Slavic clergy into
the Glagolitic alphabet and the biblical texts.
Bulgaria was officially recognised as a patriarchate by
Constantinople in 927, Serbia in 1346, and Russia in 1589. All these
nations, however, had been converted long before these dates.
The missionaries to the East and South Slavs had great success in
part because they used the people's native language rather than
Latin as the Roman priests did, or Greek.
Mission to Great Moravia
When king
Rastislav of Moravia
asked Byzantium for teachers who could minister to the Moravians in
their own language, Byzantine emperor Michael III chose two brothers, Cyril and Methodius. As their mother was a Slav from the hinterlands of Thessaloniki, the two brothers had been raised speaking the local Slavonic vernacular. Once commissioned, they immediately set about creating an alphabet, the Glagolitic alphabet. They then translated the Scripture and the liturgy into Slavonic.
This Slavic dialect became the basis of
Old Church Slavonic which later evolved into Church Slavonic
which is the common liturgical language still used by the Russian
Orthodox Church and other Slavic Orthodox Christians. The missionaries
to the East and South Slavs had great success in part because they used
the people's native language rather than Latin
or Greek. In Great Moravia, Constantine and Methodius encountered
Frankish missionaries from Germany, representing the western or Latin
branch of the Church, and more particularly representing the Holy Roman
Empire as founded by Charlemagne, and committed to linguistic, and
cultural uniformity. They insisted on the use of the Latin liturgy, and
they regarded Moravia and the Slavic peoples as part of their rightful
mission field.
When friction developed, the brothers, unwilling to be a cause of
dissension among Christians, travelled to Rome to see the Pope, seeking
an agreement that would avoid quarrelling between missionaries in the
field. Constantine entered a monastery in Rome, taking the name Cyril,
by which he is now remembered. However, he died only a few weeks
thereafter.
Pope Adrian II
gave Methodius the title of Archbishop of Sirmium (now Sremska
Mitrovica in Serbia) and sent him back in 869, with jurisdiction over
all of Moravia and Pannonia, and authorisation to use the Slavonic
Liturgy. Soon, however, Prince Ratislav, who had originally invited the
brothers to Moravia, died, and his successor did not support Methodius.
In 870 the Frankish king Louis and his bishops deposed Methodius at a
synod at Ratisbon, and imprisoned him for a little over two years. Pope John VIII secured his release, but instructed him to stop using the Slavonic Liturgy.
In 878, Methodius was summoned to Rome on charges of heresy and using
Slavonic. This time Pope John was convinced by the arguments that
Methodius made in his defence and sent him back cleared of all charges,
and with permission to use Slavonic. The Carolingian bishop who
succeeded him, Witching, suppressed the Slavonic Liturgy and forced the
followers of Methodius into exile. Many found refuge with Knyaz
Boris of Bulgaria,
under whom they reorganised a Slavic-speaking Church. Meanwhile, Pope
John's successors adopted a Latin-only policy which lasted for
centuries.
Conversion of Bulgaria
Bulgaria was a pagan country since its establishment in 681 until 864 when
Boris I
(852–889) converted to Christianity. The reasons for that decision were
complex; the most important factors were that Bulgaria was situated
between two powerful Christian empires, Byzantium and East Francia;
Christian doctrine particularly favoured the position of the monarch as
God's representative on Earth, while Boris also saw it as a way to
overcome the differences between Bulgars and Slavs.[62][63]
In 885 some of the disciples of Cyril and Methodius, including
Clement of Ohrid, Naum of Preslav and Angelaruis, returned to Bulgaria
where they were welcomed by Boris I who viewed the Slavonic liturgy as a
way to counteract Byzantine influence in the country. In a short time
they managed to prepare and instruct the future Bulgarian clergy into
the Glagolitic alphabet and the biblical texts. As a result of the Council of Preslav in AD 893, Bulgaria expelled its Greek clergy and proclaimed the Old Bulgarian language as the official language of the church and the state.
Conversion of the Rus'
The Baptism of Vladimir,
The success of the conversion of the Bulgarians facilitated the conversion of other East
Slavic peoples, most notably the Rus', predecessors of Belarusians, Russians, and Ukrainians, as well as Rusyns.
By the beginning of the 11th century most of the pagan Slavic world,
including Rus', Bulgaria and Serbia, had been converted to Byzantine
Christianity. The traditional event associated with the conversion of
Rus' is the baptism of Vladimir of Kiev in 989. However, Christianity is
documented to have predated this event in the city of Kiev and in
Georgia. Today the Russian Orthodox Church is the largest of the Orthodox Churches.
Controversy and Crusades dividing East and West
Growing tensions between East and West
The cracks and fissures in Christian unity which led to the
East-West Schism started to become evident as early as the 4th century. Cultural, political, and linguistic differences were often mixed with the theological, leading to schism.
The transfer of the Roman capital to Constantinople inevitably
brought mistrust, rivalry, and even jealousy to the relations of the two
great sees, Rome and Constantinople. It was easy for Rome to be jealous
of Constantinople at a time when it was rapidly losing its political
prominence. Estrangement was also helped along by the German invasions
in the West, which effectively weakened contacts. The rise of Islam with
its conquest of most of the Mediterranean coastline (not to mention the
arrival of the pagan Slavs in the Balkans at the same time) further
intensified this separation by driving a physical wedge between the two
worlds. The once homogenous unified world of the Mediterranean was fast
vanishing. Communication between the
Greek East and Latin West by the 7th century had become dangerous and practically ceased.[64]
Two basic problems were involved: the nature of the
primacy of the bishop of Rome and the theological implications of adding a clause to the Nicene Creed, known as the filioque clause. These doctrinal issues were first openly discussed in Photius's patriarchate.
By the 5th century, Christendom was divided into a pentarchy of five
sees with Rome accorded a primacy. The four Eastern sees of the
pentarchy considered this determined by canonical decision and not
entailing hegemony of any one local church or patriarchate over the
others. However, Rome began to interpret her primacy in terms of
sovereignty, as a God-given right involving universal jurisdiction in
the Church. The collegial and conciliar nature of the Church, in effect,
was gradually abandoned in favour of supremacy of unlimited papal power
over the entire Church. These ideas were finally given systematic
expression in the West during the
Gregorian Reform movement of the 11th century.
The Eastern churches viewed Rome's understanding of the nature of
episcopal power as being in direct opposition to the Church's
essentially conciliar structure and thus saw the two ecclesiologies as
mutually antithetical. For them, specifically,
Simon Peter's primacy
could never be the exclusive prerogative of any one bishop. All bishops
must, like St. Peter, confess Jesus as the Christ and, as such, all are
Peter's successors. The churches of the East gave the Roman See primacy
but not supremacy, the Pope being the first among equals but not
infallible and not with absolute authority.[65]
The other major irritant to Eastern Christendom was the Western use of the
filioque
clause—meaning "and the Son"—in the Nicene Creed . This too developed
gradually and entered the Creed over time. The issue was the addition by
the West of the Latin clause
filioque to the Creed, as in "the Holy Spirit... who proceeds from the Father
and the Son,"
where the original Creed, sanctioned by the councils and still used
today by the Eastern Orthodox simply states "the Holy Spirit, the Lord
and Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father." The Eastern Church
argued that the phrase had been added unilaterally, and therefore
illegitimately, since the East had never been consulted.
[66]
In the final analysis, only another ecumenical council could
introduce such an alteration. Indeed the councils, which drew up the
original Creed, had expressly forbidden any subtraction or addition to
the text. In addition to this ecclesiological issue, the Eastern Church
also considered the filioque clause unacceptable on dogmatic grounds.
Theologically, the Latin interpolation was unacceptable since it implied
that the Spirit now had two sources of origin and procession, the
Father and the Son, rather than the Father alone.
[67]
Photian schism
Main article:
Photian schism
In the 9th century AD, a controversy arose between Eastern
(Byzantine, later Orthodox) and Western (Latin, Roman Catholic)
Christianity that was precipitated by the opposition of the Roman
Pope John VII to the appointment by the Byzantine emperor Michael III of Photius I
to the position of patriarch of Constantinople. Photios was refused an
apology by the pope for previous points of dispute between the East and
West. Photius refused to accept the supremacy of the pope in Eastern
matters or accept the filioque clause. The Latin delegation at the
council of his consecration pressed him to accept the clause in order to
secure their support.
The controversy also involved Eastern and Western ecclesiastical
jurisdictional rights in the Bulgarian church, as well as a doctrinal
dispute over the
Filioque ("and from the Son") clause. That had been added to the Nicene Creed by the Latin church, which was later the theological breaking point in the ultimate Great East-West Schism in the 11th century.
Photius did provide concession on the issue of jurisdictional rights
concerning Bulgaria and the papal legates made do with his return of
Bulgaria to Rome. This concession, however, was purely nominal, as
Bulgaria's return to the Byzantine rite in 870 had already secured for
it an autocephalous church. Without the consent of
Boris I of Bulgaria, the papacy was unable to enforce any of its claims.
East-West Schism (1054)
The
East-West Schism,
or Great Schism, separated the Church into Western (Latin) and Easter
ca (Greek) branches, i.e., Western Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy. It
was the first major division since certain groups in the East rejected
the decrees of the Council of Chalcedon (see Oriental Orthodoxy),
and was far more significant. Though normally dated to 1054, the
East-West Schism was actually the result of an extended period of
estrangement between Latin and Greek Christendom over the nature of
papal primacy and certain doctrinal matters like the filioque, but intensified by cultural and linguistic differences.
The "official" schism in 1054 was the excommunication of Patriarch
Michael Cerularius of Constantinople, followed by his excommunication of papal legates. Attempts at reconciliation were made in 1274 (by the Second Council of Lyon) and in 1439 (by the Council of Basel),
but in each case the eastern hierarchs who consented to the unions were
repudiated by the Orthodox as a whole, though reconciliation was
achieved between the West and what are now called the "Eastern Rite Catholic Churches". More recently, in 1965 the mutual excommunications were rescinded by the Pope and the Patriarch of Constantinople, though schism remains.
Both groups are descended from the Early Church, both acknowledge the
apostolic succession of each other's bishops, and the validity of each other's sacraments.
Though both acknowledge the primacy of the Bishop of Rome, Eastern
Orthodoxy understands this as a primacy of honour with limited or no
ecclesiastical authority in other dioceses.
The Orthodox East perceived the Papacy as taking on monarchical
characteristics that were not in line with the church's tradition.
The final breach is often considered to have arisen after the capture and sacking of Constantinople by the
Fourth Crusade in 1204. Crusades against Christians in the East by Roman Catholic crusaders was not exclusive to the Mediterranean though (see also the Northern Crusades and the Battle of the Ice). The sacking of Constantinople and the Church of Holy Wisdom and establishment of the Latin Empire as a seeming attempt to supplant the Orthodox Byzantine Empire in 1204 is viewed with some rancour to the present day.
Many in the East saw the actions of the West as a prime determining
factor in the weakening of Byzantium. This led to the Empire's eventual
conquest and fall to Islam. In 2004,
Pope John Paul II extended a formal apology for the sacking of Constantinople in 1204; the apology was formally accepted by Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople. Many things that were stolen during this time: holy relics, riches, and many other items, are still held in various Western European cities, particularly Venice, Italy.
Crusades
The Crusades were a series of military conflicts conducted by
European Christian knights for control over the lucrative trade routes
running through the Middle East, and establishment of European, not
necessarily Christian, influence in the region. However, many historians
write that its purpose was for the defence of Christians and for the
expansion of Christian domains. Generally, the crusades refer to the
campaigns in the Holy Land against Muslim forces sponsored by the
Papacy. There were other crusades against Islamic forces in southern
Spain, southern Italy, and Sicily, as well as the campaigns of Teutonic
knights against pagan strongholds in Northeastern Europe (see
Northern Crusades). A few crusades such as the Fourth Crusade were waged within Christendom against groups that were considered heretical and schismatic (also see the Battle of the Ice and the Albigensian Crusade).
The Holy Land had been part of the Roman Empire, and thus Byzantine
Empire, until the Islamic conquests of the 7th and 8th centuries.
Thereafter, Christians had generally been permitted to visit the sacred
places in the Holy Land until 1071, when the
Seljuk Turks closed Christian pilgrimages and assailed the Byzantines, defeating them at the Battle of Manzikert.
Emperor
Alexius I asked for aid from Pope Urban II
(1088–1099) for help against Islamic aggression. He probably expected
money from the pope for the hiring of mercenaries. Instead, Urban II
called upon the knights of Christendom in a speech made at the Council of Clermont on 27 November 1095, combining the idea of pilgrimage to the Holy Land with that of waging a holy war against infidels.
The
First Crusade captured Antioch in 1099 and then Jerusalem. The Second Crusade occurred in 1145 when Edessa was retaken by Islamic forces. Jerusalem would be held until 1187 and the Third Crusade, famous for the battles between Richard the Lionheart and Saladin. The Fourth Crusade, begun by Innocent III
in 1202, intended to retake the Holy Land but was soon subverted by
Venetians who used the forces to sack the Christian city of Zara.[68]
Eventually the crusaders arrived in Constantinople. Rather than
proceed to the Holy Land the crusaders instead sacked Constantinople and
other parts of Asia Minor effectively establishing the
Latin Empire
of Constantinople in Greece and Asia Minor. This was effectively the
last crusade sponsored by the papacy, with later crusades being
sponsored by individuals.[68]
Jerusalem was held by the crusaders for nearly a century, and other
strongholds in the Near East would remain in Christian possession much
longer. The crusades in the Holy Land ultimately failed to establish
permanent Christian kingdoms. Islamic expansion into Europe would renew
and remain a threat for centuries culminating in the campaigns of
Suleiman the Magnificent in the 16th century.[68]
Crusades in southern Spain, southern Italy, and Sicily eventually lead to the demise of Islamic power in Europe.
[68]
The Teutonic knights expanded Christian domains in Eastern Europe, and
the much less frequent crusades within Christendom, such as the
Albigensian Crusade, achieved their goal of maintaining doctrinal unity.[68]
Hesychast Controversy
Gregory Palamas.
In 1337
Hesychasm—a mystical teaching at Mount Athos came under attack from Barlaam of Calabria,
an abbot in Constantinople. Barlaam propounded a more intellectual and
propositional approach to the knowledge of God than the Hesychasts
taught. Hesychasm is a form of constant purposeful prayer or
experiential prayer, explicitly referred to as contemplation focusing on the idea of stillness and the characteristic mystical idea of light as the vehicle for knowing God.
Gregory Palamas, afterwards Archbishop of Thessalonica,
defended Hesychasm. Several synods took one position or the other until
in 1351 at a synod under the presidency of the Emperor John VI Cantacuzenus,
Hesychast doctrine was established as the doctrine of the Orthodox
Church. the theology was especially attractive in the East because it
validated the use of icons as a vehicle for contemplation of divine
light.[69]
Eastern Orthodox captivity (1453–1850)
Fall of Constantinople
In 1453, Constantinople fell to the
Ottoman Empire. By this time Egypt had been under Muslim control for some seven centuries, but Orthodoxy was very strong in Russia which had recently acquired an autocephalous status; and thus Moscow called itself the Third Rome, as the cultural heir of Constantinople.
Under Ottoman rule, the
Greek Orthodox Church acquired substantial power as an autonomous millet.
The ecumenical patriarch was the religious and administrative ruler of
the entire "Greek Orthodox nation" (Ottoman administrative unit), which
encompassed all the Eastern Orthodox subjects of the Empire.
Eastern Christians fleeing Constantinople, and the Greek manuscripts
they carried with them, is one of the factors that prompted the literary
renaissance in the West at about this time.
Isolation from the West
As a result of the Ottoman conquest of the Byzantine Empire in 1453, and the
Fall of Constantinople,
the entire Orthodox communion of the Balkans and the Near East became
suddenly isolated from the West. For the next four hundred years, it
would be confined within a hostile Islamic world, with which it had
little in common religiously or culturally. The Russian Orthodox Church was the only part of the Orthodox communion which remained outside the control of the Ottoman Empire.
It is, in part, due to this geographical and intellectual confinement
that the voice of Eastern Orthodoxy was not heard during the
Reformation
in 16th-century Europe. As a result, this important theological debate
often seems strange and distorted to the Orthodox. They never took part
in it and thus neither Reformation nor Counter-Reformation is part of their theological framework.
Religious rights under the Ottoman Empire
The new
Ottoman government
that conquered the Byzantine Empire followed Islamic law when dealing
with the conquered Christian population. Christians were officially
tolerated as People of the Book.
As such, the Church's canonical and hierarchical organisation were not
significantly disrupted and its administration continued to function.
One of the first things that Mehmet the Conqueror did was to allow the Church to elect a new patriarch, Gennadius Scholarius.
Because
Islamic law
makes no distinction between nationality and religion, all Christians,
regardless of their language or nationality, were considered a single millet, or nation. The patriarch, as the highest-ranking hierarch, was thus invested with civil and religious authority and made ethnarch,
head of the entire Christian Orthodox population. This meant that all
Orthodox Churches within Ottoman territory were under the control of
Constantinople. However, these rights and privileges, including freedom
of worship and religious organisation, were often established in
principle but seldom corresponded to reality. Christians were viewed as second-class citizens, and the legal protections they depended upon were subject to the whims of the Sultan and the Sublime Porte.[70][71]
Under Ottoman occupation the Church could no longer bear witness to
Christ. Christian missionary work among Muslims was illegal and
dangerous, whereas conversion to Islam was entirely legal and
permissible. Converts to Islam who returned to Orthodoxy were put to
death as apostates. No new churches could be built and even the ringing
of church bells was prohibited. The
Hagia Sophia and the Parthenon,
which had been Christian churches for nearly a millennium, were
converted into mosques. Education of the clergy and the Christian
population either ceased altogether or was reduced to the most
rudimentary elements. Violent persecutions of Christians were common,
and reached their climax in the Armenian, Assyrian, and Greek genocides.
Corruption
The Orthodox Church found itself subject to the Turkish system of
corruption. The patriarchal throne was frequently sold to the highest
bidder, while new patriarchal investiture was accompanied by heavy
payment to the government. In order to recoup their losses, patriarchs
and bishops taxed the local parishes and their clergy.
Few patriarchs between the 15th and the 19th centuries died a natural
death while in office. The forced abdications, exiles, hangings,
drownings, and poisonings of patriarchs are well documented. The
hierarchy's positions were often dangerous as well. The hanging of
patriarch
Gregory V
from the gate of the patriarchate on Easter Sunday 1821 was accompanied
by the execution of two metropolitans and twelve bishops.
Late Middle Ages and the early Renaissance (1300–1520)
Avignon Papacy (1309–1378)
The
Avignon Papacy, sometimes referred to as the Babylonian Captivity, was a period from 1309 to 1378 during which seven Popes resided in Avignon, in modern-day France.[72]
The period was one of conflict and controversy during which French
Kings held considerable sway over the Papacy and rulers across Europe
felt sidelined by the new French-centric papacy.[citation needed]
Troubles reached their peak in 1378 when,
Gregory XI died while visiting Rome. A papal conclave met in Rome and elected Urban VI, an Italian. Urban soon alienated the French cardinals, and they held a second conclave electing Robert of Geneva to succeed Gregory XI, beginning the Western Schism.
Western Schism (1378–1416)
The
Western Schism,
or Papal Schism, was a prolonged period of crisis in Latin Christendom
from 1378 to 1416, when there were two or more claimants to the See of
Rome and there was conflict concerning the rightful holder of the
papacy. The conflict was political, rather than doctrinal, in nature.
In 1309,
Pope Clement V,
due to political considerations, moved to Avignon in southern France
and exercised his pontificate there. For sixty-nine years popes resided
in Avignon rather than Rome. This was not only an obvious source of
confusion but of political animosity as the prestige and influence of
city of Rome waned without a resident pontiff. Though Pope Gregory XI,
a Frenchman, returned to Rome in 1378, the strife between Italian and
French factions intensified, especially following his subsequent death.
In 1378 the conclave, elected an Italian from Naples,
Pope Urban VI;
his intransigence in office soon alienated the French cardinals, who
withdrew to a conclave of their own, asserting the previous election was
invalid since its decision had been made under the duress of a riotous
mob. They elected one of their own, Robert of Geneva, who took the name Pope Clement VII. By 1379, he was back in the palace of popes in Avignon, while Urban VI remained in Rome.
For nearly forty years, there were two papal curias and two sets of
cardinals, each electing a new pope for Rome or Avignon when death
created a vacancy. Each pope lobbied for support among kings and princes
who played them off against each other, changing allegiance according
to political advantage. In 1409, a council was convened at Pisa to
resolve the issue. The council declared both existing popes to be
schismatic (Gregory XII from Rome, Benedict XIII from Avignon) and
appointed a new one, Alexander V. The existing popes refused to resign
and thus there were three papal claimants. Another council was convened
in 1414, the
Council of Constance.
In March 1415 the Pisan pope John XXIII fled from Constance in
disguise. He was brought back a prisoner and deposed in May. The Roman
pope, Gregory XII, resigned voluntarily in July. The Avignon pope,
Benedict XIII, refused to come to Constance, nor would he consider
resignation. The council deposed him in July 1417. The council in
Constance elected
Pope Martin V as pope in November, having finally cleared the field of popes and antipopes, .
John Wycliff and Jan Hus
John Wycliffe
(or Wyclif) (1330–1384) was an English scholar and heretic best known
for denouncing the corruptions of the Church, and his sponsoring the
first translation of the Bible from Latin into English. He was a
precursor of the Protestant Reformation. He emphasized the supremacy of
the Bible, and called for a direct relationship between man and God,
without interference by priests and bishops. His followers, called Lollards,
faced persecution by the Church of England. They went underground for
over a century and played a role in the English Reformation.[73][74]
Jan Hus
(or Huss) (1369?–1415) a Czech theologian in Prague, was influenced by
Wycliffe and spoke out against the corruptions he saw in the Church; his
continued defiance led to his excommunication and condemnation by the Council of Constance, which also condemned John Wycliff.
Hus was executed in 1415, but his followers organized a peasants' war,
1419–1436, that was put down by the Empire with great brutality. Hus was
a forerunner of the Protestant Reformation and his memory has become a
powerful symbol of Czech culture in Bohemia.[75]
Italian Renaissance (c.1375–1520)
Michelangelo's Pietà in St. Peter's Basilica, Vatican City
The
Renaissance
was a period of great cultural change and achievement, marked in Italy
by a classical orientation and an increase of wealth through mercantile
trade. The City of Rome, the Papacy, and the Papal States were all
affected by the Renaissance. On the one hand, it was a time of great
artistic patronage and architectural magnificence, where the Church
pardoned such artists as Michelangelo, Brunelleschi, Bramante, Raphael, Fra Angelico, Donatello, and da Vinci.
On the other hand, wealthy Italian families often secured episcopal
offices, including the papacy, for their own members, some of whom were
known for immorality, such as Alexander VI and Sixtus IV.
In addition to being the head of the Church, the Pope became one of Italy's most important secular rulers, and pontiffs such as
Julius II
often waged campaigns to protect and expand their temporal domains.
Furthermore, the popes, in a spirit of refined competition with other
Italian lords, spent lavishly both on private luxuries but also on
public works, repairing or building churches, bridges, and a magnificent
system of aqueducts in Rome that still function today.
From 1505 to 1626,
St. Peter's Basilica,
perhaps the most recognised Christian church, was built on the site of
the old Constantinian basilica. It was also a time of increased contact
with Greek culture, opening up new avenues of learning, especially in
the fields of philosophy, poetry, classics, rhetoric, and political science, fostering a spirit of humanism–all of which would influence the Church.
Reformation and Counter-Reformation
Protestant Reformation (1521–1610)
In the early 16th century, movements were begun by two theologians,
Martin Luther and Huldrych Zwingli,
that aimed to reform the Church; these reformers are distinguished from
previous ones in that they considered the root of corruptions to be
doctrinal (rather than simply a matter of moral weakness or lack of
ecclesiastical discipline) and thus they aimed to change contemporary
doctrines to accord with what they perceived to be the "true gospel."
The word Protestant is derived from the Latin protestatio meaning declaration which refers to the letter of protestation by Lutheran princes against the decision of the Diet of Speyer in 1529, which reaffirmed the edict of the Diet of Worms against the Reformation.[76] Since that time, the term has been used in many different senses, but most often as a general term refers to Western Christianity that is not subject to papal authority.[76]
The term "Protestant" was not originally used by Reformation era
leaders; instead, they called themselves "evangelical", emphasising the
"return to the true gospel (Greek: euangelion)."[77]
The beginning of the Protestant Reformation is generally identified with
Martin Luther and the posting of the 95 Theses on the castle church in Wittenberg, Germany. Early protest was against corruptions such as simony, episcopal vacancies, and the sale of indulgences. The Protestant position, however, would come to incorporate doctrinal changes such as sola scriptura and sola fide. The three most important traditions to emerge directly from the Protestant Reformation were the Lutheran, Reformed (Calvinist, Presbyterian, etc.), and Anglican
traditions, though the latter group identifies as both "Reformed" and
"Catholic", and some subgroups reject the classification as
"Protestant."
The Protestant Reformation may be divided into two distinct but basically simultaneous movements, the
Magisterial Reformation and the Radical Reformation. The Magisterial Reformation involved the alliance of certain theological teachers (Latin: magistri)
such as Luther, Zwingli, Calvin, Cranmer, etc. with secular magistrates
who cooperated in the reformation of Christendom. Radical Reformers,
besides forming communities outside state sanction, often employed more
extreme doctrinal change, such as the rejection of tenets of the
Councils of Nicaea and Chalcedon. Often the division between magisterial
and radical reformers was as or more violent than the general Catholic
and Protestant hostilities.
The Protestant Reformation spread almost entirely within the confines
of Northern Europe, but did not take hold in certain northern areas
such as Ireland and parts of Germany. By far the magisterial reformers
were more successful and their changes more widespread than the radical
reformers. The Catholic response to the Protestant Reformation is known
as the Counter Reformation, or Catholic Reformation, which resulted in a
reassertion of traditional doctrines and the emergence of new religious
orders aimed at both moral reform and new missionary activity. The
Counter Reformation reconverted approximately 33% of Northern Europe to
Catholicism and initiated missions in South and Central America, Africa,
Asia, and even China and Japan. Protestant expansion outside of Europe
occurred on a smaller scale through colonisation of North America and
areas of Africa.
Martin Luther
Main article:
Martin Luther
Martin Luther, by Lucas Cranach the Elder
Martin Luther was an Augustinian friar and professor at the
University of Wittenberg. In 1517, he published a list of 95 Theses,
or points to be debated, concerning the illicitness of selling
indulgences. Luther had a particular disdain for Aristotelian
philosophy, and as he began developing his own theology, he increasingly
came into conflict with Thomistic scholars, most notably Cardinal Cajetan.[78] Soon, Luther had begun to develop his theology of justification,
or process by which one is "made right" (righteous) in the eyes of God.
In Catholic theology, one is made righteous by a progressive infusion
of grace accepted through faith and cooperated with through good works.
Luther's doctrine of justification differed from Catholic theology in
that justification rather meant "the declaring of one to be righteous",
where God imputes the merits of Christ upon one who remains without
inherent merit.[79]
In this process, good works are more of an unessential byproduct that
contribute nothing to one's own state of righteousness. Conflict between
Luther and leading theologians lead to his gradual rejection of
authority of the Church hierarchy. In 1520, he was condemned for heresy
by the papal bull Exsurge Domine, which he burned at Wittenberg along with books of canon law.[80]
Ulrich Zwingli
Ulrich Zwingli, wearing the scholar's cap.
Ulrich Zwingli was a Swiss scholar and parish priest who was likewise
influential in the beginnings of the Protestant Reformation. Zwingli
claimed that his theology owed nothing to Luther, and that he had
developed it in 1516, before Luther's famous protest, though his
doctrine of justification was remarkably similar to that of the German
friar.
[81] In 1518, Zwingli was given a post at the wealthy collegiate church of the
Grossmünster in Zurich,
where he would remain until his death at a relatively young age. Soon
he had risen to prominence in the city, and when political tension
developed between most of Switzerland and the Catholic Habsburg Emperor Charles V.
In this environment, Zwingli began preaching his version of reform,
with certain points as the aforementioned doctrine of justification, but
others (with which Luther vehemently disagreed) such as the position
that veneration of icons was actually idolatry and thus a violation of
the first commandment, and the denial of the real presence in the Eucharist.[82]
Soon the city council had accepted Zwingli's doctrines and Zurich
became a focal point of more radical reforming movements, and certain
admirers and followers of Zwingli pushed his message and reforms far
further than even he had intended, such as rejecting infant baptism.[83]
This split between Luther and Zwingli formed the essence of the
Protestant division between Lutheran and Reformed theology. Meanwhile,
political tensions increased; Zwingli and the Zurich leadership imposed
an economic blockade on the inner Catholic states of Switzerland, which
led to a battle in which Zwingli, in full armor, was slain along with his troops.
John Calvin
Main article:
John Calvin
John Calvin was a French cleric and doctor of law turned Protestant
reformer. He belonged to the second generation of the Reformation,
publishing his theological tome, the
Institutes of the Christian Religion, in 1536 (later revised), and establishing himself as a leader of the Reformed church in
Geneva,
which became an "unofficial capital" of Reformed Christianity in the
second half of the 16th century. He exerted a remarkable amount of
authority in the city and over the city council, such that he has
(rather ignominiously) been called a "Protestant pope." Calvin
established an eldership together with a "consistory", where pastors and the elders established matters of religious discipline for the Genevan population.[84] Calvin's theology is best known for his doctrine of (double) predestination, which held that God had, from all eternity, providentially foreordained who would be saved (the elect) and likewise who would be damned (the reprobate).
Predestination was not the dominant idea in Calvin's works, but it
would seemingly become so for many of his Reformed successors.[85]
English Reformation
Unlike other reform movements, the
English Reformation began by royal influence. Henry VIII
considered himself a thoroughly Catholic King, and in 1521 he defended
the papacy against Luther in a book he commissioned entitled, The Defence of the Seven Sacraments, for which Pope Leo X awarded him the title Fidei Defensor (Defender of the Faith). However, the king came into conflict with the papacy when he wished to annul his marriage with Catherine of Aragon, for which he needed papal sanction. Catherine, among many other noble relations, was the aunt of Emperor Charles V,
the papacy's most significant secular supporter. The ensuing dispute
eventually lead to a break from Rome and the declaration of the King of
England as head of the English Church.
England would later experience periods of frenetic and eclectic reforms
contrasted by periods led by staunch conservatives. Monarchs such as Edward VI, Mary I, Elizabeth I, and Archbishops of Canterbury such as Thomas Cranmer and William Laud
pushed the Church of England in many directions over the course of only
a few generations. What emerged was a state church that considered
itself both "Reformed" and "Catholic" but not "Roman" (and hesitated
from the title "Protestant"), and other "unofficial" more radical
movements such as the Puritans.
Counter-Reformation (1545–1610)
The Counter-Reformation, or Catholic Reformation, was the response of
the Catholic Church to the Protestant Reformation. The essence of the
Counter-Reformation was a renewed conviction in traditional practices
and the upholding of Catholic doctrine as the source of ecclesiastic and
moral reform, and the answer to halt the spread of Protestantism. Thus
it experienced the founding of new religious orders, such as the
Jesuits, the establishment of seminaries
for the proper training of priests, renewed worldwide missionary
activity, and the development of new yet orthodox forms of spirituality,
such as that of the Spanish mystics and the French school of spirituality. The entire process was spearheaded by the Council of Trent, which clarified and reasserted doctrine, issued dogmatic definitions, and produced the Roman Catechism.
Though Ireland, Spain, France, and elsewhere featured significantly
in the Counter-Reformation, its heart was Italy and the various popes of
the time, who established the
Index Librorum Prohibitorum (the list of prohibited books) and the
Roman Inquisition, a system of juridical tribunals that prosecuted heresy and related offences. The Papacy of St. Pius V
(1566–1572) was known not only for its focus on halting heresy and
worldly abuses within the Church, but also for its focus on improving
popular piety in a determined effort to stem the appeal of
Protestantism. Pius began his pontificate by giving large alms to the
poor, charity, and hospitals, and the pontiff was known for consoling
the poor and sick, and supporting missionaries. The activities of these
pontiffs coincided with a rediscovery of the ancient Christian catacombs
in Rome. As Diarmaid MacCulloch
stated, "Just as these ancient martyrs were revealed once more,
Catholics were beginning to be martyred afresh, both in mission fields
overseas and in the struggle to win back Protestant northern Europe: the
catacombs proved to be an inspiration for many to action and to
heroism."[86]
The Council of Trent
The
Council of Trent (1545–1563), initiated by Pope Paul III (1534–1549) addressed issues of certain ecclesiastical corruptions such as simony, absenteeism, nepotism,
and other abuses, as well as the reassertion of traditional practices
and the dogmatic articulation of the traditional doctrines of the
Church, such as the episcopal structure, clerical celibacy, the seven Sacraments, transubstantiation
(the belief that during mass the consecrated bread and wine truly
become the body and blood of Christ), the veneration of relics, icons,
and saints (especially the Blessed Virgin Mary),
the necessity of both faith and good works for salvation, the existence
of purgatory and the issuance (but not the sale) of indulgences, etc.
In other words, all Protestant doctrinal objections and changes were
uncompromisingly rejected. The Council also fostered an interest in
education for parish priests to increase pastoral care. Milan's Archbishop Saint Charles Borromeo (1538–1584) set an example by visiting the remotest parishes and instilling high standards.
Catholic missions
Catholic missions were carried to new places beginning with the new
Age of Discovery, and the Roman Catholic Church established a number of Missions in the Americas and other colonies in order to spread Christianity in the New World and to convert the indigenous peoples. At the same time, missionaries such as Francis Xavier as well as other Jesuits, Augustinians, Franciscans and Dominicans
were moving into Asia and the Far East. The Portuguese sent missions
into Africa. While some of these missions were associated with
imperialism and oppression, others (notably Matteo Ricci's Jesuit mission to China) were relatively peaceful and focused on integration rather than cultural imperialism.
Church and the Enlightenment (1610–1800)
Trial of Galileo
The
Galileo affair, in which Galileo Galilei came into conflict with the Roman Catholic Church over his support of Copernican astronomy, is often considered a defining moment in the history of the relationship between religion and science.
In 1610,
Galileo published his Sidereus Nuncius (Starry Messenger), describing the surprising observations that he had made with the new telescope. These and other discoveries exposed major difficulties with the understanding of the Heavens that had been held since antiquity, and raised new interest in radical teachings such as the heliocentric theory of Copernicus.
In reaction, many scholars maintained that the motion of the Earth and immobility of the
Sun were heretical, as they contradicted some accounts given in the Bible as understood at that time. Galileo's part in the controversies over theology, astronomy and philosophy culminated in his trial and sentencing in 1633, on a grave suspicion of heresy.
Puritans in North America
The most famous colonisation by Protestants in the New World was that of English
Puritans
in North America. Unlike the Spanish or French, the English colonists
made surprisingly little effort to evangelise the native peoples.[87] The Puritans, or Pilgrims,
left England so that they could live in an area with Puritanism
established as the exclusive civic religion. Though they had left
England because of the suppression of their religious practice, most
Puritans had thereafter originally settled in the Low Countries
but found the licentiousness there, where the state hesitated from
enforcing religious practice, as unacceptable, and thus they set out for
the New World and the hopes of a Puritan utopia.
Early Modern era
This is the period from the
Industrial revolution and the French Revolution until the mid 19th century.
See the
French Republican Calendar and anti-clerical measures. See also the Holy League, the Battle of Vienna, Cardinal Richelieu, and Louis XIV of France.
Revivalism (1720–1906)
Revivalism refers to the
Calvinist and Wesleyan revival, called the Great Awakening, in North America which saw the development of evangelical Congregationalist, Presbyterian, Baptist, and new Methodist churches.
Great Awakenings
The
First Great Awakening was a wave of religious enthusiasm among Protestants in the American colonies c.
1730–1740, emphasising the traditional Reformed virtues of Godly
preaching, rudimentary liturgy, and a deep sense of personal guilt and
redemption by Christ Jesus. Historian Sydney E. Ahlstrom saw it as part
of a "great international Protestant upheaval" that also created Pietism in Germany, the Evangelical Revival, and Methodism in England.[88] It centred on reviving the spirituality of established congregations, and mostly affected Congregational, Presbyterian, Dutch Reformed, German Reformed, Baptist, and Methodist
churches, while also spreading within the slave population. The Second
Great Awakening (1800–1830s), unlike the first, focused on the
unchurched and sought to instil in them a deep sense of personal
salvation as experienced in revival meetings. It also sparked the
beginnings of groups such as the Mormons, the Restoration Movement and the Holiness movement. The Third Great Awakening
began from 1857 and was most notable for taking the movement throughout
the world, especially in English speaking countries. The final group to
emerge from the "great awakenings" in North America was Pentecostalism, which had its roots in the Methodist, Wesleyan, and Holiness movements, and began in 1906 on Azusa Street, in Los Angeles. Pentecostalism would later lead to the Charismatic movement.
Restorationism
Restorationism refers to the belief that a purer form of Christianity should be restored using the
early church as a model.[89]:635[90]:217
In many cases, restorationist groups believed that contemporary
Christianity, in all its forms, had deviated from the true, original
Christianity, which they then attempted to "Reconstruct", often using
the Book of Acts
as a "guidebook" of sorts. Restorationists do not usually describe
themselves as "reforming" a Christian church continuously existing from
the time of Jesus, but as restoring the Church that they believe was lost at some point. "Restorationism" is often used to describe the Stone-Campbell Restoration Movement.
Jehovah's Witnesses
The term "Restorationist" is also used to describe the
Jehovah's Witness Movement, founded in the late 1870s by Charles Taze Russell
Latter Day Saint movement
The term "Restorationist" is also used to describe the
Latter Day Saint movement, including The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), the Community of Christ and numerous other Latter Day Saints sects. Latter Day Saints believe that Joseph Smith was chosen to restore the original organization established by Jesus, now "in its fullness", rather than to reform the church.[91][92]
Late Modern era
The history of the Church from the mid 19th century around period of the
revolutions of 1848 to today.
Modern Eastern Orthodoxy
Russian Orthodox Church in the Russian Empire
The Russian Orthodox Church held a privileged position in the
Russian Empire, expressed in the motto of the late Empire from 1833: Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Populism. Nevertheless, the Church reform of Peter I in the early 18th century had placed the Orthodox authorities under the control of the Tsar. An official (titled Ober-Procurator) appointed by the Tsar himself ran the committee which governed the Church between 1721 and 1918: the Most Holy Synod.
The Church became involved in the various campaigns of
russification,[93] and was accused of involvement in anti-Jewish pogroms.[94]
In the case of anti-Semitism and the anti-Jewish pogroms, no evidence
is given of the direct participation of the Church, and many Russian
Orthodox clerics, including senior hierarchs, openly defended persecuted
Jews, at least from the second half of the 19th century.[95] Also, the Church has no official position on Judaism as such.[95][96]
The
Bolsheviks and other Russian revolutionaries saw the Church, like the Tsarist state, as an enemy of the people.
Russian Orthodox Church in the Soviet Union
The Russian Orthodox Church collaborated with the
White Army in the Russian Civil War (see White movement) after the October Revolution. This may have further strengthened the Bolshevik animus against the church.
After the October Revolution of 7 November 1917 (25 October Old Calendar) there was a movement within the
Soviet Union to unite all of the people of the world under Communist rule (see Communist International).
This included the Eastern European bloc countries as well as the Balkan
States. Since some of these Slavic states tied their ethnic heritage to
their ethnic churches, both the peoples and their church where targeted
by the Soviet.[97][98] Criticism of atheism was strictly forbidden and sometimes lead to imprisonment.[99]
The Soviet Union was the first state to have as an ideological
objective the elimination of religion. Toward that end, the Communist
regime confiscated church property, ridiculed religion, harassed
believers, and propagated
anti-religious atheistic propaganda
in the schools. Actions toward particular religions, however, were
determined by State interests, and most organised religions were never
outlawed. Some actions against Orthodox priests and believers along with
execution included torture being sent to prison camps, labour camps or mental hospitals.[100][101] The result of state atheism
was to transform the Church into a persecuted and martyred Church. In
the first five years after the Bolshevik revolution, 28 bishops and
1,200 priests were executed.[102] This included people like the Grand Duchess Elizabeth Fyodorovna who was at this point a monastic. Along with her murder was Grand Duke Sergei Mikhailovich Romanov; the Princes Ioann Konstantinovich, Konstantin Konstantinovich, Igor Konstantinovich and Vladimir Pavlovich Paley; Grand Duke Sergei's secretary, Fyodor Remez; and Varvara Yakovleva,
a sister from the Grand Duchess Elizabeth's convent. They were herded
into the forest, pushed into an abandoned mineshaft and grenades were
then hurled into the mineshaft. Her remains were buried in Jerusalem, in the Church of Maria Magdalene.
The main target of the anti-religious campaign in the 1920s and 1930s
was the Russian Orthodox Church, which had the largest number of
faithful. Nearly its entire clergy, and many of its believers, were shot
or sent to labor camps. Theological schools were closed, and church
publications were prohibited. In the period between 1927 and 1940, the
number of Orthodox Churches in the Russian Republic fell from 29,584 to
fewer than 500. Between 1917 and 1940, 130,000 Orthodox priests were
arrested. Father
Pavel Florensky was one of the New-martyrs of this particular period.
After Nazi Germany's attack on the Soviet Union in 1941, Joseph
Stalin revived the Russian Orthodox Church to intensify patriotic
support for the war effort. By 1957 about 22,000 Russian Orthodox
churches had become active. But in 1959 Nikita Khrushchev initiated his
own campaign against the Russian Orthodox Church and forced the closure
of about 12,000 churches. By 1985 fewer than 7,000 churches remained
active.
[103]
In the Soviet Union, in addition to the methodical closing and
destruction of churches, the charitable and social work formerly done by
ecclesiastical authorities was taken over by the state. As with all
private property, Church owned property was confiscated into public use.
The few places of worship left to the Church were legally viewed as
state property which the government permitted the church to use. After
the advent of state funded universal education, the Church was not
permitted to carry on educational, instructional activity for children.
For adults, only training for church-related occupations was allowed.
Outside of sermons during the celebration of the divine liturgy it could
not instruct or evangelise to the faithful or its youth. Catechism
classes, religious schools, study groups, Sunday schools and religious
publications were all illegal and or banned. This persecution continued,
even after the death of Stalin until the
dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. This caused many religious tracts to be circulated as illegal literature or samizdat.[100] Since the fall of the Soviet Union there have been many New-martyrs added as Saints from the yoke.
Diaspora emigration to the West
One of the most striking developments in modern historical Orthodoxy
is the dispersion of Orthodox Christians to the West. Emigration from
Greece and the Near East in the last hundred years has created a sizable
Orthodox diaspora in Western Europe, North and South America, and
Australia. In addition, the Bolshevik Revolution forced thousands of
Russian exiles westward. As a result, Orthodoxy's traditional frontiers
have been profoundly modified. Millions of Orthodox are no longer
geographically "eastern" since they live permanently in their newly
adopted countries in the West. Nonetheless, they remain Eastern Orthodox
in their faith and practice.
Modern trends in Christian theology
Modernism and liberal Christianity
Liberal Christianity,
sometimes called liberal theology, is an umbrella term covering
diverse, philosophically informed religious movements and moods within
late 18th, 19th and 20th-century Christianity. The word "liberal" in
liberal Christianity does not refer to a leftist political agenda or set of beliefs, but rather to the freedom of dialectic process associated with continental philosophy and other philosophical and religious paradigms developed during the Age of Enlightenment.
Fundamentalism
Fundamentalist Christianity, is a movement that arose mainly within British and American
Protestantism in the late 19th century and early 20th century in reaction to modernism
and certain liberal Protestant groups that denied doctrines considered
fundamental to Christianity yet still called themselves "Christian."
Thus, fundamentalism sought to re-establish tenets that could not be
denied without relinquishing a Christian identity, the "fundamentals": inerrancy of the Bible, Sola Scriptura, the Virgin Birth of Jesus, the doctrine of substitutionary atonement, the bodily Resurrection of Jesus, and the imminent return of Jesus Christ.
Under/During Nazism
The position of Christians affected by Nazism is highly complex.
Regarding the matter, historian Derek Holmes wrote, "There is no
doubt that the Catholic districts, resisted the lure of National
Socialism [Nazism] far better than the Protestant ones."
[104] Pope Pius XI declared - Mit brennender Sorge - that Fascist governments had hidden "pagan intentions" and expressed the irreconcilability of the Catholic position and Totalitarian Fascist State Worship, which placed the nation above God and fundamental human rights
and dignity. His declaration that "Spiritually, [Christians] are all
Semites" prompted the Nazis to give him the title "Chief Rabbi of the
Christian World."[105]
Catholic priests were executed in concentration camps alongside Jews; for example, 2,600 Catholic Priests were imprisoned in
Dachau,
and 2,000 of them were executed. A further 2,700 Polish priests were
executed (a quarter of all Polish priests), and 5,350 Polish nuns were
either displaced, imprisoned, or executed.[106] Many Catholic laymen and clergy played notable roles in sheltering Jews during the Holocaust, including Pope Pius XII
(1876–1958). The head rabbi of Rome became a Catholic in 1945 and, in
honour of the actions the Pope undertook to save Jewish lives, he took
the name Eugenio (the pope's first name).[107]
A former Israeli consul in Italy claimed: "The Catholic Church saved
more Jewish lives during the war than all the other churches, religious
institutions, and rescue organisations put together."[108]
The relationship between Nazism and Protestantism, especially the
German Lutheran Church, was complex. Though many[citation needed] Protestant church leaders in Germany supported the Nazis' growing anti-Jewish activities, some, such as Dietrich Bonhoeffer
(a Lutheran pastor) were strongly opposed to the Nazis. Bonhoeffer was
later found guilty in the conspiracy to assassinate Hitler and executed.
Second Vatican Council
On 11 October 1962,
Pope John XXIII opened the Second Vatican Council, the 21st ecumenical council
of the Catholic Church. The council was "pastoral" in nature,
emphasising and clarifying already defined dogma, revising liturgical
practices, and providing guidance for articulating traditional Church
teachings in contemporary times. The council is perhaps best known for
its instructions that the Mass may be celebrated in the vernacular as
well as in Latin.
Ecumenism
Ecumenism broadly refers to movements between Christian groups to establish a degree of unity through dialogue. "
Ecumenism" is derived from Greek
οἰκουμένη (
oikoumene),
which means "the inhabited world", but more figuratively something like
"universal oneness." The movement can be distinguished into Catholic
and Protestant movements, with the latter characterised by a redefined
ecclesiology of "denominationalism" (which the Catholic Church, among
others, rejects).
Catholic ecumenism
Over the last century, a number of moves have been made to reconcile the
schism between the Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox churches.
Although progress has been made, concerns over papal primacy and the
independence of the smaller Orthodox churches has blocked a final
resolution of the schism.
On 30 November 1894,
Pope Leo XIII published the Apostolic Letter Orientalium Dignitas
(On the Churches of the East) safeguarding the importance and
continuance of the Eastern traditions for the whole Church. On 7
December 1965, a Joint Catholic-Orthodox Declaration of Pope Paul VI and
the Ecumenical Patriarch Athenagoras I was issued lifting the mutual excommunications of 1054.
Some of the most difficult questions in relations with the ancient
Eastern Churches concern some doctrine (i.e. Filioque, Scholasticism, functional purposes of asceticism, the essence of God, Hesychasm, Fourth Crusade, establishment of the Latin Empire, Uniatism
to note but a few) as well as practical matters such as the concrete
exercise of the claim to papal primacy and how to ensure that
ecclesiastical union would not mean mere absorption of the smaller
Churches by the Latin component of the much larger Catholic Church (the
most numerous single religious denomination in the world), and the
stifling or abandonment of their own rich theological, liturgical and
cultural heritage.
With respect to Catholic relations with Protestant communities,
certain commissions were established to foster dialogue and documents
have been produced aimed at identifying points of doctrinal unity, such
as the
Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification produced with the Lutheran World Federation in 1999.
Pentecostal movement
Main article:
Pentecostalism
The final Great Awakening (1904 onwards) had its roots in the
Holiness movement which had developed in the late 19th century. The
Pentecostal revival movement began, out of a passion for more power and a
greater outpouring of the Spirit. In 1902, the American evangelists
Reuben Archer Torrey and Charles M. Alexander conducted meetings in
Melbourne, Australia, resulting in more than 8,000 converts. News of
this revival travelled fast, igniting a passion for prayer and an
expectation that God would work in similar ways elsewhere.
Torrey and Alexander were involved in the beginnings of the great
Welsh revival (1904) which led Jessie Penn-Lewis to witness the working
of Satan during times of revival, and write her book "War on the
Saints". In 1906, the modern Pentecostal Movement was born on Azusa
Street in Los Angeles.
Another noteworthy development in 20th-century Christianity was the
rise of the modern Pentecostal movement. Although its roots predate the
year 1900, its actual birth is commonly attributed to the 20th century.
Sprung from Methodist and Wesleyan roots, it arose out of the meetings
at an urban mission on
Azusa Street
in Los Angeles. From there it spread around the world, carried by those
who experienced what they believed to be miraculous moves of God there.
These Pentecost-like manifestations have steadily been in evidence
throughout the history of Christianity—such as seen in the two Great
Awakenings that started in the United States. However, Azusa Street is
widely accepted as the fount of the modern Pentecostal movement.
Pentecostalism, which in turn birthed the Charismatic movement within already established denominations, continues to be an important force in western Christianity.
In reaction to these developments,
Christian fundamentalism
was a movement to reject the radical influences of philosophical
humanism, as this was affecting the Christian religion. Especially
targeting critical approaches to the interpretation of the Bible, and
trying to blockade the inroads made into their churches by atheistic
scientific assumptions, the fundamentalists began to appear in various
denominations as numerous independent movements of resistance to the
drift away from historic Christianity. Over time, the Fundamentalist
Evangelical movement has divided into two main wings, with the label
Fundamentalist following one branch, while Evangelical
has become the preferred banner of the more moderate movement. Although
both movements primarily originated in the English-speaking world, the
majority of Evangelicals now live elsewhere in the world.
Ecumenism within Protestantism
Ecumenical
movements within Protestantism have focused on determining a list of
doctrines and practices essential to being Christian and thus extending
to all groups which fulfil these basic criteria a (more or less)
co-equal status, with perhaps one's own group still retaining a "first
among equal" standing. This process involved a redefinition of the idea
of "the Church" from traditional theology. This ecclesiology, known as
denominationalism, contends that each group (which fulfils the essential
criteria of "being Christian") is a sub-group of a greater "Christian
Church", itself a purely abstract concept with no direct representation,
i.e., no group, or "denomination", claims to be "the Church." This ecclesiology
is at variance with other groups that indeed consider themselves to be
"the Church." The "essential criteria" generally consist of belief in
the Trinity, belief that Jesus Christ is the only way to have forgiveness and eternal life, and that He died and rose again bodily.